Statement:
The discipline of Tibetan Buddhist Studies in the United States has shifted its focus over the last three decades. Beginning as a project that was concerned principally with the study of philosophical texts, and relying almost exclusively on emic, or tradition-centered, interpretive schemes, the field has broadened its scope considerably. Today, scholars are still concerned with philosophical texts, but also with the ritual, historiographical and visionary literature, with the oral texts in which Tibetans describe their lives and daily practices, and with the material aspects of Tibetan religious culture. The way of understanding this material has also shifted, as Tibetologists draw on a wide array of theoretical models and hermeneutical tools: from comparison to Continental thought to gender studies and queer theory. In my studies, I am interested in bringing these contemporary, Western approaches to understanding religion into conversation with indigenous Tibetan theory. My goal, in part, is to demonstrate the richness and sophistication of the Tibetan intellectual tradition, a richness that goes beyond Tibet's mere use as a datum.
Selected Publications:
- Tibetan Ritual (New York: Oxford University Press, 2009)
- Freedom From Extremes: Gorampa's "Distinguishing the Views" and the Polemics of Emptiness, Boston: Wisdom Publications, 2006.
- "The Discipline and Its Other," Journal of the American Academy of Religion, vol. 74, no. 1 (2006).
- "Two Views on the Svatantrika/Prasangika Distinction in 14th century Tibet," in G. Dreyfus and S. McClintock, eds., The Svatantrika/Prasangika Distinction: What Difference Does a Difference Make? (Boston: Wisdom Publications, 2003).
- Identity and the Politics of Scholarship in the Study of Religion [NY: Routledge, 2004], co-edited with Sheila Greeve Davaney.
- "Two Views of the Svatantrika/Prasangika Distinction in Fourteenth Century Tibet," in Georges B. J. Dreyfus and Sara L. McClintock, eds., The Svatantrika/Prasangika Distinction: What Difference Does a Difference Make? [Boston: Wisdom, 2003].
- "Buddhism and Science: On the Nature of the Dialogue," in Alan Wallace, ed., Buddhism and Science: Breaking New Ground [NY: Columbia University Press, 2003].
- "Authorship and Literary Production in Classical Buddhist Tibet," in Guy Newland, ed., Changing Minds: Contributions to the Study of Buddhism and Tibet in Honor of Jeffrey Hopkins. [Ithaca: Snow Lion, 2001].
"A Talk on Buddhist Sexual Ethics at a Symposium in Kathmandu"
Current/Planned Research/Projects:
I am currently working on two books: (1) a book on Buddhism and sexuality in the Indo-Tibetan tradition that will focus on questions of sexual ethics and "deviant" sexualities, and (2) a study of the commodification of Tibetan religion and culture, tentatively entitled Consuming Tibet. I am also the principal investigator for the Sera Project, an interdisciplinary digital initiative whose goal it is to document Buddhist monastic life in one of Tibet's great monasteries.
Courses Taught:
Undergraduate:
- RS 31: Religions of Tibet
- RS 135: Readings in Tibetan Texts
- RS 171: The Schools of Tibetan Buddhism
- RS 184A: The Practice of Tibetan Buddhism
- RS 184B: Tibetan Buddhist Thought
Graduate:
- RS 135: Guided Readings in Tibetan Buddhist Texts.
- RS 254A: Seminar on Tibetan Buddhist Traditions.
- RS 254B: The Study of Tibet from the Missionaries to Cultural Studies.
- RS 254C: Seminar on Indo-Tibetan Buddhist Philosophy.
- RS 225: Religion and Material Culture.
The Religious Studies Department also offers two years of Tibetan language.